IBD UPDATE: Data Storage Stocks Gain On Enterprise Demand

March 31, 2012

A prevailing trend has shown businesses placing data storage higher on their priority list. That’s helping drive results for EMC,NetApp (NTAP), Fusion-io (FIO),Western Digital (WDC) and other makers of hard drives and data storage systems.

Solid-state storage, which uses flash-type memory chips, is used in mobile phones and the iPad. Fusion-io and OCZ Technology (OCZ) make solid-state devices that plug directly into computer servers, speeding up the delivery of Web content. Fusion-io’s two biggest customers are Apple (AAPL) and Facebook (FB).

Read the entire article (click on the logo):


Can Fusion-IO Outrun The Tiger? (repost)

January 18, 2012

There is a saying that goes, “you don’t have to be faster than the tiger, you just have to be faster than your slowest friend.” That may be a constructive way of thinking about Fusion-IO (NYSE:FIO) today. There’s no question that this is a high-growth tech stock with a huge multiple and huge expectations, but that has never stopped those tech stocks that can deliver the goods. (For more, seeEarning Forecasts: A Primer.)

Big Data 2.0
In some respects, what Fusion-IO seeks to do is relatively simple. In the same way that solid-state drives (SSD) have offered consumers considerably better performance than hard disk drives, Fusion-IO is trying to bring the advantages of flash/SSD memory to the enterprise data market.

Fusion-IO sells a two-part solution. The hardware consists of products like to ioDrive, a collection of flash cards (ioMemory) containing an array of NAND flash chips and an FPGA. These attach literally to the process server (through PCI Express) and can dramatically increase the throughput rates as a result.

There is also a software component, with the Virtual Storage Layer (VSL) software arguably the most important part. This is host driver software that manages the interface between the ioDrive and the operating system. Fusion-IO also has the directCache product that allows Fusion-IO’s products to work in virtualized systems like those created byVMware (NYSE:VMW).

Why Bother?
So why is Fusion-IO doing this? Don’t EMC (NYSE:EMC), NetAppliance (Nasdaq:NTAP) and International Business Machine (NYSE:IBM) already handle the storage needs for Big Data? Yes and no. There are certainly ample virtues to the approach used by EMC (and the others), particularly when it concerns large amounts of data.

The problem, though, is that these aren’t always especially fast systems – there’s something of a “request and go fetch” aspect to it. What Fusion-IO offers is a solution that is much faster (and ultimately cheaper) when speed is of the essence. It’s not yet economical to create an entirely flash-based storage network, but it can make sense for smaller pieces of time-sensitive data.

Early Days
It’s not fair to say that Fusion-IO is a solution in search of a market, but it is fair to say that this is a small early-stage opportunity. Some analysts believe that this will be a $5 billion addressable market in 2015 – by way of comparison, EMC has logged over $19 billion in revenue in its past twelve months. That said, don’t confuse “small today” with “small forever.” Just as hard drives replaced tape-based drives years ago, SSD is going to continue to grow as the costs come down.

Competitors and Buyers
Fusion-IO has a head-start on the competition, but that won’t last very long. First, there is a risk that the VSL software becomes a commoditized product over the next couple of years. More to the point, companies like EMC, NetApp, STEC (Nasdaq:STEC) and LSI (NYSE:LSI) have this market opportunity in their sights. EMC’s Project Lightning should ship in 2012 and while not so much is known about the hardware component, EMC does already have very good storage management software.

Looking more broadly, a host of other companies could potentially get into this market. Chip companies like Marvel Technology (Nasdaq:MRVL), SanDisk (Nasdaq:SNDK), Intel (Nasdaq:INTC) and Samsung arguably have the hardware wherewithal, but need to find a way to implement the software side – something that could get easier if VSL does become a commodity.

There’s also a good chance that Fusion-IO goes into the buyout rumor mill. OEM partners IBM and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ) could certainly use this company to enliven the growth prospects of their storage businesses, while EMC has never been shy about pulling out its wallet to cover gaps in its own technology.

The Bottom Line
There’s no point in talking about valuation on a stock like Fusion-IO; sell side analysts will assign grotesque multiples to sales or earnings three years hence, but the reality is that it’s nearly impossible to model growth stories like this correctly. Trading at about nine times trailing sales, Fusion-IO is already in the neighborhood of pure software plays like VMware and ahead of other growth hardware names like F5 Network (Nasdaq:FFIV) or Mellanox (Nasdaq:MLNX).

None of this means that the stock can’t work – the reality of growth tech investing is that multiples seldom stand in the way of further appreciation if the growth is there. It’s a consummate case of “buy high and hope to sell higher.” So long as investors understand the risks that go with that sort of investing, and the inevitability of some “hiccups” along the way that lead to occasional sharppullbacks, it isn’t such a bad aggressive play. (For additional reading, check out 5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

 

Read more: http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2012/Can-Fusion-IO-Outrun-The-Tiger-FIO-EMC-IBM-VMW0117.aspx#ixzz1jqpYngsv


First it was John Cagle…then Woody Hutsell…now Shane Robison

January 12, 2012

I was just thinking about all the little camp fires that are now burning around Fusion-io.  Whether it’s the obvious competition from Virident or OCZ/Marvell or STEC or the less obvious and longer sales cycles of appliance vendors like Violin Memory or even attempts to update legacy storage with flash from EMC or NetApp.

And then I was looking at TOPSY results for Fusion-io.  If you are not aware of TOPSY go there right now — a very cool tweet search engine.  And I noticed a very long list of career opens at Fusion-io:  see the sample below.

Anyway, about those campfires — they are having the oxygen sucked out of them by some very clever folks at Fusion-io who are hiring just about everyone and anyone in the flash space.

Moral of the Story:  if you want to be relevant in flash — you need to be recruited into Fusion-io (at least for now).

Department Position Title City State
Sales Account Executive – Atlanta Atlanta GA
Sales – APAC Account Executive – Beijing Beijing
Reliability/Tools NVM Technologist Boulder CO
Reliability/Tools HA Applications Engineer Boulder CO
Sales OEM Systems Engineer Raleigh NC
Sales Account Executive – Carolinas Raleigh NC
Sales OEM Systems Engineer Round Rock TX
Sales Renewal Manager Salt Lake City UT
Software Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City UT
Software Engineering Test Automation Engineer Salt Lake City UT
Hardware Engineering Senior Software Engineer Salt Lake City UT
Reliability/Tools Solid State Storage Tech Salt Lake City UT
Reliability/Tools Engineering Technician Salt Lake City UT
Finance Accounting Manager Salt Lake City UT
Finance Accounts Receivable Manager Salt Lake City UT
HR Recruiting Business Partner Salt Lake City UT
Software Engineering Student Intern Salt Lake City, UT or Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Engineering Program Manager Salt Lake City, UT or Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Applications Team Manager Salt Lake City, UT or San Jose, CA
Software Engineering Senior Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT or San Jose, CA
Reliability/Tools Software Engineer Lead Salt Lake City, UT or San Jose, CA
Operations Manufacturing Engineer Salt Lake City, UT or San Jose, CA
Software Engineering Senior Build Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Software Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Hardware Engineering Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Reliability/Tools Senior Software Engineer Salt Lake City, UT; San Jose, CA; Boulder, CO
Sales Systems Engineer Manager, West San Jose CA
Sales OEM Systems Engineer San Jose CA
Software Engineering Technical Manager of Platform Team San Jose CA
Software Engineering Senior Software Engineer San Jose CA
Software Engineering SAN Protocols and Windows Engineer San Jose CA
Software Engineering Senior SQA Engineer San Jose CA
Software Engineering Performance Engineer San Jose CA
Software Engineering SQA Engineer San Jose CA
Software Engineering SQA Engineer San Jose CA
Software Engineering Virtualization Engineer San Jose CA
Finance Sales Commissions Manager San Jose CA
Finance Finance Manager San Jose CA
Virtualization Solutions Senior Software Engineer San Jose CA
Virtualization Solutions Kernel Engineer San Jose CA
Virtualization Solutions QA Lead San Jose CA
Virtualization Solutions Systems Software Engineer San Jose CA
Virtualization Solutions Kernel Engineer San Jose CA
Virtualization Solutions Senior Software Engineer San Jose CA
Sales – APAC Sales Engineer – Shanghai Shanghai
Sales – APAC Account Executive – South China South China
Sales Account Executive – FED Civilian Washington DC DC

Can you say this on TV? Dell, EMC, Fujitsu, HDS, HP, IBM, LSI, NetApp, NEC, Promise and every other manufacturer of the classic dual controller, modular array or monolithic array have got it wrong.

April 14, 2010

 

Comment Xiotech wants CorteX to be the door to a new storage world. CorteX is a REST-using API that lets an application access and manage Xiotech’s storage brick, its ISE (Intelligent Stage Element), the sort of super disk drive with fail-in-place components, a five-year warranty and terrific performance from its multiple spindles.

See the entire post here:  “Xiotech’s CorteX to change the storage world”


Barron’s Repost: Upside in Store for Storage

December 3, 2009

Merriman Curhan says demand is tracking well for the storage sector.

Merriman Curhan Ford

OUR REVIEW OF THE calendar third-quarter 2009 earnings season points to a solid pickup from the doldrums of the first-half 2009 tech recession with a median-sequential increase in revenue of 8% amongst our coverage universe, adding some weight to our argument of the second-half 2009 pickup in spending and a “budget” flush heading into fourth-quarter 2009 (up from 3% in the September quarter).

As we detail, clearly the Storage names in our universe were the outperformers as Data Networking vendors trailed on most metrics, adding weight to our sentiment that deferred upgrades to Storage capacity in early 2009 were to experience a catch up later this year as most information-technology organizations couldn’t defer these investments indefinitely.

And within the Storage universe, the clearest area of growth in our view was amongst the mid-market-focused vendors such as NetApp (ticker: NTAP) and Compellent Technologies (CML), whose customer bases have more responsive-budget cycles as compared to the larger enterprise focused EMC (EMC) and 3PAR (PAR) (with both Compellent and NetApp posting near 10% sequential growth).

We continue to favor a weighting toward the Storage sector through fourth-quarter 2009 as demand appears to be tracking well for most of our coverage universe, as well as Networking names such as Riverbed Technology (RVBD) that continue to focus on increasing its technology partnerships in the SAN and NAS [networking technologies] markets. Separately, vendors with specific near-term drivers such as Super Micro Computer (SMCI) (Nehalem tailwinds) and Netezza (NZ) (TwinFin product cycle) should help boost performance through the year end.

Related price-valuation ranges: EMC, sum of the parts, $18-$22; NetApp, 16 times-18 times calendar 2010 adjusted price/earnings multiple, $28-$35; Compellent, 3 times-3.9 times calendar 2010 enterprise value (EV)/sales, $19-$23; Super Micro, 11 times-15 times calendar 2010 adjusted P/E, $11-$14; Netezza, 2.8 times-3.4 times calendar 2010 EV/sales, $12-$14.

–Alex Kurtz


Why PCIe-based SSDs Are Important

November 20, 2009

There’s an old expression I like: “Different isn’t better, it’s just different.”

When it comes to SSDs based around a SATA or SAS format — that’s pretty much the case in my view. Yes there are exceptional products suited for enterprise like Pliant and STEC. And, yes — there are more conventional items for consumers like Intel and OCZ (and about 20 others).  And yes, the standard pacakge 3.5″ form factor for these devices make them suitable for shared storage as well as for integration into hetreogenous and homogenous storage environments like you might find in a typical data center.  Embracing these SSDs you will find the usual manufacturers like EMC, NetApp, SUN, and others.  Their use of SSD is evolutionary, easy to digest.

PCIe-based SSDs are very different.  For one thing, they sit on the server system bus right next to the CPU.  This is a direct attached (DAS) model that has numerous advantages for certain types of processing.  We agree that not all PCIe-based SSDs are suitable for all applications — but in terms of applications that can take advantage of bandwidth, throughput, and latency enhancements, these devices are indeed a superior architecture.

There are some challenges:

1)  Not all servers are created equal.  PCIe-based devices require strict adherance to the PCIe specifications at the server level.  Ping if you want to learn more about why this is critical.

2)  Many servers do not have enough PCIe slots configure appropriately for PCIe devices.  This is especially true when creating HIGH AVAILABILITY (or HA) environments.

3)  Only a very few servers have enough of the right type of slots to be meaningful from a value perspective.  It makes no sense to refresh a server for a PCIe-based SSD if you have to spend 2x or 3x to get the right slots, power, etc.

4)  Applications may not be optimized for SSD DAS.  No kidding.  OLTP or DBMS applications that can take the most advantage of SSD DAS are optimized for high latency disk access over networks such as NAS.  These applications are totally comfortable sending out 1000s or 10s of 1000s of transaction requests to build up a queue depth for the CPUs.  The net result of this is that the CPUs appear very busy but in fact aren’t doing very much.  These limitations are known and well defined.  Over time, application vendors such as SUN, Oracle, and Microsoft will implement fixes to optimize PCIe-based storage.

Aside from these items, there is a discussion regarding suitability of NAND flash devices in the data center as well as the MLC/SLC issue.  I’ll tackle those in another post.  In my veiw, MySpace and Wine.com are leading the way — and there are many others who have not come forward publicly preferring to keep the ROI and GREEN advantages all to themselves.

The latest announcements from Fusion-io, Texas Memory Systems, Micron and others point out these differences.  FULL DISCLOSURE:  I am a former employe of Fusion-io.


Comparing Enterprise-Class SSD Storage Appliances

November 19, 2009

The market for SSD-based or at least SSD-inclusive storage appliances is broadening from purpose-built devices in support of specific applications to a more generic layer some call TierZero supporting basic compute operations that require low latency, fast throughput, higher bandwidth.  Below is a list of manufacturers; I’m pulling together some notes and will publish a brief chart in a future post.

  • 3Par
  • Avere
  • Compellant
  • Data Direct Networks
  • DataRam
  • DELL
  • DolphinICS
  • EMC
  • Gear6
  • HP
  • Hitachi Data Systems
  • IBM
  • NetApp
  • Nimbus
  • Schooner Information Technology
  • Solid Access
  • SUN
  • Teradata
  • Texas Memory Systems
  • Violin Memory
  • WhipTail

I’m interested in published specifications, use-cases, and sales strategy.  Hopefully this will help you cut through some of the clutter.

 

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 137 other followers